caffienekitty: (sherlock-wrong)
caffienekitty ([personal profile] caffienekitty) wrote2010-10-12 04:48 am
Entry tags:

Sherlock Fic: Mornington Crescent Revisited

Title: Mornington Crescent Revisited
Fandom: Sherlock (BBC 2010)
Disclaimer: Not my world or my characters.
Rating/Warnings: Gen. PG. Conversation-format. Silly. Will likely make NO SENSE. Not beta'd
Word Count: 330 words
A/N: Triggered by a 'Make me a Monday' prompt by [livejournal.com profile] rinyula, but this is more like the coda to the fic the prompt is asking for, maybe. Everything I know about Mornington Crescent came from Wikipedia, so I'm pretty sure I've got everything horribly wrong. Contains a reference to 'Good Omens'. [LJ-Only]
Summary: Sherlock only ever plays to win.



-
Mornington Crescent Revisited
by CaffieneKitty
-



"Mornington Crescent."

"Not possible."

"It can't be not possible."

"You can't get from Picadilly to Mornington Crescent like that, it's against the rules."

"I keep telling you, there are no actual rules."

"Every game has rules, John, even if the players aren't conciously aware of them."

"What?"

"All those times you and Lestrade played, there were rules you were following."

"No there weren't, we were just doing it to wind you up when you were being a prat."

"Ah, but you followed rules regardless."

"That's not... Well, sort of, I guess, if you stretch the definition of 'rules'."

"Always. Now. How exactly do you propose you got from Picadilly Circus to Mornington Crescent with no intervening stops?"

"Walked."

"No walks longer than two minutes."

"That was never said!"

"It's what I have observed."

"How about you then? You said you could skip three stations by going through the back rooms at that bookshop!"

"You can. If you'd like, we can go out right now and I'll prove it to you."

"No, that's fine, I'm sure you'd know."

"So, how do you justify Picadilly to Mornington Crescent?"

"I dunno. Anything. Tunnel-drilling Tibetan monks."

"Don't be facetious."

"I'm not! If you can use a bookshop's back rooms, I don't see why I can't use tunnel-drilling Tibetan monks."

"Because the bookshop's back rooms exist. Tunnel-drilling Tibetan monks don't."

"Do you know that for sure? Have you been to Tibet?"

"Yes, have you?"

"...no. But you might just not have met any tunnel-drilling monks while you were there."

"And if I have been to Tibet and haven't met any tunnel-drilling Tibetan monks, and you haven't been to Tibet at all, how would you hold sufficient sway over tunnel-drilling Tibetan monks to get one to drill a hole from Picadilly to Mornington Crescent? One that can be walked in less than two minutes?"

"Maybe I know one from Afghanistan. Multi-national forces after all."

"I am certain that a Tibetan monk, tunnel-drilling or not, would not be part of the war in Afghanistan."

"Civilian consultant? Lot of tunnels in Afghanistan."

"It would still need to be a tunnel you could walk in less than two minutes and the geographical distance alone-"

"Okay! I'll leave off about the monks! Wormhole then."

"Wormhole?"

"Trans-dimensional portal?"

"If you're going to be ridiculous-"

"All right, fine! I withdraw my Mornington Crescent! Bloody Charing Cross instead!"

"Thank you."

"You're welcome."

"Oh and John?"

"What?"

"Mornington Crescent in six moves."

- - -
(that's all, apologies to Mornington Crescent aficionados)

[identity profile] definewisdom.livejournal.com 2010-10-12 12:31 pm (UTC)(link)
Hee... That was fun. Of course Sherlock would be able to put rules to Mornington Crescent. He can deduce anything.

[identity profile] dear-monday.livejournal.com 2010-10-12 12:34 pm (UTC)(link)
Ahh, ILUSM for the Good Omens reference :D
& this wins ♥

[identity profile] rinyula.livejournal.com 2010-10-12 12:50 pm (UTC)(link)
This was amazing! I love Sherlock trying force *some* sort of logic onto the game. XD And the last line is gold. Thank you for writing it! <3

(Also, Good Omens reference! *squee*)

[identity profile] tehomet.livejournal.com 2010-10-12 02:56 pm (UTC)(link)
It amuses me that the Cucumberpatch has actually been to Tibet.

Great story. :D

There's about three Mornington Crescent inspired ficlets on the comm right now and they are all worth reading, IMHO, but this is the only one in which Sherlock starts deducing, or possibly divining, rules. How appropriate and IC for him!

[identity profile] arianedevere.livejournal.com 2010-10-12 03:01 pm (UTC)(link)
This is bloody marvellous!

[identity profile] morelindo.livejournal.com 2010-10-12 03:06 pm (UTC)(link)
OMG that was fantastic fun! Thank you so much :D

[identity profile] ciaranbochna.livejournal.com 2010-10-12 07:08 pm (UTC)(link)
Don't know the game, but...

"Tunnel-drilling Tibetan monks" FTW..lol

[identity profile] katead.livejournal.com 2010-10-12 11:47 pm (UTC)(link)
*SQUEE* :DDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD
...I have nothing to add

[identity profile] thette.livejournal.com 2010-10-13 06:45 pm (UTC)(link)
*giggle* *hearts*

[identity profile] dendritejungle.livejournal.com 2010-10-16 06:23 pm (UTC)(link)
Ah! I'm glad you warned for "no sense", though it made much MORE sense once I read what Mornington Crescent actually was - thanks for the link! :D

Appropriate icon is appropriate. ;)

[identity profile] quamquam20.livejournal.com 2010-10-17 06:12 pm (UTC)(link)
lol how have I not read this yet!? It's amazing. I love how quickly it gets complicated XD

[identity profile] quamquam20.livejournal.com 2010-10-18 01:59 am (UTC)(link)
hahaha definitely. He can't even enjoy a nice round of MC.

[identity profile] musical-lottie.livejournal.com 2010-11-03 04:51 pm (UTC)(link)
Great fic! I loved it.

I, er, have researched Mornington Crescent as extensively as I can, yet it still baffles me due to the complete lack of rules - I just can't get my heard around that.

I NEED SHERLOCK TO EXPLAIN THE RULES TO ME!

[identity profile] rilakkuma-donut.livejournal.com 2012-05-30 04:50 am (UTC)(link)
*giggles madly* Lovely! ♥